Tyler Durden's Guy Logic vs. Chick Logic

GUY LOGIC VS. CHICK LOGIC:

GUY LOGIC:
A) X = X

B) X-characteristic = X-related-quality

C) you are carrying a gun and have 100,000$ cash in a briefcase = you are
probably a bad person"

D) "This guy's got a gun and a briefcase.. he's probably bad"


CHICK LOGIC:
A) X = Y

B) X-characteristic = Y-unrelated-quality

C) you are stupid girls sitting in a club looking around with a stupid look on
your face (that I can SAY I think looks 'bad', even though it doesn't really
look like ANYTHING) = you are BADGIRLS

D) "these girls have a fiesty look in their eyes.. they are BADGIRLS"

--------------------

MORE DETAILED EXAMPLES OF THE PROCESS:

Ask an arbitrary question. "Do girls think that David Bowie is hot?", "Do you think I would look good if I died my hair ALL BLONDE?", "Do you think that spells work?", etc etc etc

REGARDLESS of her answer, PLAYFULLY-MISINTERPRET this as evidence that she is a "bad-girl".

-"ooooohhhh nooooo... ooooohhh noooo.. you just like David Bowie because he's total GLAM.. it's always BADGIRLS that like that.. you're bad, FOR SURE.."

-"oooh nooo.. my friend with BLONDE HAIR??? oh no, dude DO NOT listen to this girl, SHE-IS-BAD... look at the smile on her face.. dude, she is FIESTY.. do
NOT listen to this girl.. she has bad-girl written ALL OVER HER.."

-"spells? spells? oh no dude, we can't talk to this girl.. she's bad.. she-is-BAD.. look at the knowing grin on her.. she knows her stuff... I don't even KNOW what this girl could be up to.."

SAME THING when you have NOTHING to go on.. Just pick an ARBITRARY quality on
her.. Her clothes, her smile, her aloofness, WHATEVER..

-"dude, LOOK at this girl.. LOOOOOOK.. see it in her eyes??? She is BAD.."

-"oh man, LOOK at the necklace on her.. oh man, this girl is FIESTY.. she is PLAYFUL.. she is ADVENTUROUS.. I *KNOW* girls like this.."

-----------------

GROUP DYNAMICS - HOW TO USE THIS TO YOUR ADVANTAGE:

-Choose your target. If you call her "FIESTY", then try saying it to her FRIENDS.. "This one is FIESTY, isn't she???" This disarms the friends, similarly to Mystery's technique of OPENING off of the ugliest person in the peer group. You are ADDRESSING the group, and you are NOT hitting on the friend in the "normal" way.

People may recall that I took an HB8.5 right off her DATE, using this technique. ("is she always tricky like this?? does she always do this?? she is FIESTY isn't she?", to the GUY she was on a date with.. he was DISARMED, and she was AROUSED.. a combo that works for you in MULTIPLE ways, simultaneously)

-Play the mini-cold-reads OFF OF eachother. "she IS bad.. you guys are the NICE ones (to the obstacles)... I can only hang with you guys.. you guys are safe.. this girl is BAD (to the target).."

This gets the little LSE obstacles thinking that you're nice, and DISARMS what you're doing to their friend (your target).

---------------

CONCLUSION - CHICK LOGIC AS SEEN IN SOAP OPERAS:

Want to see stupid $*!@ like this IN ACTION?? Check out a stupid soap-opera, like "Passions" or "Days of our Lives".

You'll notice that its *saturated* in STUPID $*!@, like:

-"Billy got trapped in the snowstorm, and now he can never find his true love with Lucette.. could the snowstorm really interfere with them finding the potential of their true love?!?!?!"

-"Patricia got a fake palm-reading because Janet hired a fake to trick her into thinking that Bo is her true love, and not Ethan.. Will Patricia ever really find true happiness?"

-"Melissa hired a street-thug to SWITCH the paternity tests, so that she could be with Jake, even though its really not his son.. Now Jake will have to be with HER, and Crystal will never fulfill the love that she had with Jake, all because of this terrible trickery!"

-"Allen slipped DRUGS into Alicia's drink, WITHOUT HER KNOWING.. now she's a drug-addict, and a prostitute.. a total BADGIRL.. and its not her fault!"


THIS IS WHAT GIRLS ARE *ADDICTED* TO.

$*!@ where X = Y, and it makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER, except through LEAPS of logic. There has to be SOME logic to it, but since its CHICK-LOGIC, there is no actual SOUNDNESS required.

You can generate this CRACK FOR CHICKS in the field, by making ILLOGICAL conclusions, that some particular quality leads to some EXCITING characteristic about them, that they weren't aware of, but maybe had fantasized at some point that they had.